Reed Arena · at Texas A&M · Conference game
Closing line
TA&M -10.5✓ TA&M covered by 12.5
Closing total155.5Over by 5.5
| This season | TA&M | |
|---|---|---|
| 11-8 | Record | 15-4 |
| 9-10 | ATS | 12-7 |
| 11-8 | O/U | 12-7 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SC 75–85 TA&M · ✓ TA&M (80%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SC | 25 | 44 | 69 |
| TA&M | 46 | 46 | 92 |
1st half: SC 25, TA&M 46 (TA&M by 21). The model had TA&M by 5.7 and a total of 75.1 (actual 71).
Team stats
| SC | TA&M | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-61 39% | Field goals | 33-69 48% |
| 9-25 36% | 3-pointers | 17-39 44% |
| 12-12 100% | Free throws | 9-10 90% |
| 30 7 off | Rebounds | 43 13 off |
| 12 | Assists | 25 |
| 6 | Steals | 6 |
| 5 | Blocks | 6 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 11 | Fouls | 13 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 0 | Fast-break points | 18 |
Players
| SC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kobe Knox G | 38 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 7-14 | 2-2 |
| Myles Stute G | 35 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 4-11 | 3-7 |
| Meechie Johnson G | 34 | 26 | 4 | 5 | 7-12 | 2-4 |
| Mike Sharavjamts G | 29 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Elijah Strong F | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-8 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Grant Polk G | 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| EJ Walker F | 19 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Hayden Assemian F | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Jordan Butler F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Eli Ellis, Eli Sparkman, Christ Essandoko, Nordin Kapic, Cam Scott, Abu Yarmah
| TA&M | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Dominguez G | 28 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-10 |
| Rashaun Agee F | 26 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-3 |
| Jacari Lane G | 24 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 3-5 | 0-2 |
| Rylan Griffen G | 24 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 6-11 | 3-5 |
| Marcus Hill G | 22 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Pop Isaacs G | 24 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4-9 | 2-7 |
| Ali Dibba G | 16 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-2 |
| Zach Clemence F | 15 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 7-8 | 7-8 |
| Josh Holloway G | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Jamie Vinson F | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Federiko Federiko F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Chris McDermott, Jeremiah Green, Noah Shelby, Mackenzie Mgbako
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketTA&M -10.5
ModelTA&M -9.8
Model edgeSC +0.7
L TA&M covered
Total
Market155.5
Model160.5
Model edgeOver 5.0
W Over
Projected score
SC 75.3 · TA&M 85.1
SC 69 · TA&M 92
Win probability
TA&M 80%
1st half
Spread
TA&M -5.7
TA&M -21.0
Total
75.1
71 points
Projected score
SC 34.7 · TA&M 40.4
SC 25 · TA&M 46
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenTA&M -8.5
2 → TA&M
CloseTA&M -10.5
2 pts toward TA&M
Total
Open156.5
▼ 1
Close155.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
SC +470 · TA&M -650
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened TA&M -8.5 · closed TA&M -10.5 · moved 2 toward TA&Mmodel TA&M -10
model TA&M -10
Opened 156.5 · closed 155.5 · moved 1 downmodel 160.5
model 160.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SC 2–2 TA&MSeries tied · 4 games since 2021-22 · SC 3-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | TA&M 76 @ SC 72 | SC +5.5 | SC W |
| Feb 28, 2023-24 | SC 70 @ TA&M 68 | TA&M -5.5 | SC W |
| Jan 14, 2022-23 | TA&M 94 @ SC 53 | SC +7.5 | TA&M W |
| Jan 29, 2021-22 | SC 74 @ TA&M 63 | TA&M -7 | SC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
South Carolina
19 games played
Straight up
11-8
58% wins
Against the spread
9-10
47% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-8
58% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 91-72 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 83-79 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 81-61 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-58 | -10.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 72-79 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 77-79 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-62 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 83-86 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-51 | -22.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 71-55 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 61-68 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 95-70 | -31.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 96-67 | -19.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-83 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 78-68 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-75 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 74-108 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-71 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 85-76 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NCAT
W 91-72
−3.5
9
vs
USM
W 83-79
−13.5
12
vs
PRES
W 81-61
+3.5
18
vs
RAD
W 87-58
+18.5
21
vs
BTLR
L 72-79
−3.5
23
vs
NU
L 77-79
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
W 74-62
−5.5
2
vs
VT
L 83-86
−5.5
6
vs
STET
W 82-51
+8.5
13
vs
CIT
W 71-55
−6.5
16
@
CLEM
L 61-68
+5.5
22
vs
SCST
W 95-70
−6.5
30
vs
UALB
W 96-67
+9.5
3
vs
VAN
L 71-83
−2.5
6
@
LSU
W 78-68
+17.5
10
vs
UGA
L 70-75
−0.5
14
@
ARK
L 74-108
−21.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-71
+9.5
20
vs
OU
W 85-76
+11.5
covered 9didn’t cover 10avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NCAT
W 91-72
+19.5
9
vs
USM
W 83-79
+14.5
12
vs
PRES
W 81-61
+4.5
18
vs
RAD
W 87-58
−8.5
21
vs
BTLR
L 72-79
+0.5
23
vs
NU
L 77-79
+9.5
28
vs
CHSO
W 74-62
−14.5
2
vs
VT
L 83-86
+19.5
6
vs
STET
W 82-51
−9.5
13
vs
CIT
W 71-55
−15.5
16
@
CLEM
L 61-68
−13.5
22
vs
SCST
W 95-70
+15.5
30
vs
UALB
W 96-67
+14.5
3
vs
VAN
L 71-83
−1.5
6
@
LSU
W 78-68
+0.5
10
vs
UGA
L 70-75
−18.5
14
@
ARK
L 74-108
+26.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-71
−14.5
20
vs
OU
W 85-76
+10.5
over 11under 8avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas A&M
19 games played
Straight up
15-4
79% wins
Against the spread
12-7
63% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-7
63% overs · avg +4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-68 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 104-70 | -29.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 63-87 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 174.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 74-86 | -10.5 | L −22.5 | 172.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-81 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 109-68 | -23.5 | W +17.5 | 162.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 120-84 | -42.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 95-59 | +1.5 | W +37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 81-73 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 80-93 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 112-75 | -26.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 118-77 | -28.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 111-82 | -29.5 | L −0.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 75-72 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 90-88 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 168.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-76 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 82-87 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-70 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-68 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NWST
W 98-68
+8.5
6
vs
TXSO
W 104-70
+4.5
9
@
OKST
L 63-87
−26.5
14
vs
UCF
L 74-86
−22.5
18
vs
MONT
W 86-81
−12.5
21
vs
MAN
W 109-68
+17.5
25
vs
MVSU
W 120-84
−6.5
28
vs
FSU
W 95-59
+37.5
2
@
PITT
W 81-73
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
L 80-93
−14.5
14
vs
JAX
W 112-75
+10.5
21
vs
ETAM
W 118-77
+12.5
29
vs
PV
W 111-82
−0.5
3
vs
LSU
W 75-72
−2.5
6
@
AUB
W 90-88
+8.5
10
vs
OU
W 83-76
+2.5
13
@
TENN
L 82-87
+6.5
17
@
TEX
W 74-70
+8.5
21
vs
MSST
W 88-68
+11.5
covered 12didn’t cover 7avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NWST
W 98-68
+12.5
6
vs
TXSO
W 104-70
+12.5
9
@
OKST
L 63-87
−24.5
14
vs
UCF
L 74-86
−12.5
18
vs
MONT
W 86-81
+2.5
21
vs
MAN
W 109-68
+14.5
25
vs
MVSU
W 120-84
+49.5
28
vs
FSU
W 95-59
−20.5
2
@
PITT
W 81-73
+1.5
7
vs
SMU
L 80-93
+8.5
14
vs
JAX
W 112-75
+39.5
21
vs
ETAM
W 118-77
+28.5
29
vs
PV
W 111-82
+15.5
3
vs
LSU
W 75-72
−21.5
6
@
AUB
W 90-88
+9.5
10
vs
OU
W 83-76
−6.5
13
@
TENN
L 82-87
+9.5
17
@
TEX
W 74-70
−22.5
21
vs
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
over 12under 7avg +4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Carolina
11-8 overall · 2-4 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Oklahoma85–76
- L@ Auburn67–71
- L@ Arkansas74–108
- Lvs Georgia70–75
- W@ LSU78–68
4 days since their last game.
Texas A&M
15-4 overall · 5-1 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Mississippi St88–68
- W@ Texas74–70
- L@ Tennessee82–87
- Wvs Oklahoma83–76
- W@ Auburn90–88
3 days since their last game.