M&T Bank Arena · at Quinnipiac
Closing line
QUIN -9.5✓ QUIN covered by 12.5
Closing total150.5Under by 30.5
| This season | QUIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-1 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-1 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 1-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CCSU 70–79 QUIN · ✓ QUIN (77%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCSU | 27 | 22 | 49 |
| QUIN | 37 | 34 | 71 |
1st half: CCSU 27, QUIN 37 (QUIN by 10). The model had QUIN by 5.0 and a total of 69.8 (actual 64).
Team stats
| CCSU | QUIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-65 28% | Field goals | 29-71 41% |
| 4-23 17% | 3-pointers | 8-26 31% |
| 9-14 64% | Free throws | 5-7 71% |
| 40 12 off | Rebounds | 41 10 off |
| 12 | Assists | 10 |
| 3 | Steals | 8 |
| 4 | Blocks | 6 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 5 |
| 9 | Fouls | 17 |
| 20 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 5 | Fast-break points | 14 |
Players
| CCSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Jones G | 34 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-1 |
| Ja'Kobe Williams G | 31 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0-6 | 0-3 |
| Max Frazier F | 27 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
| Darin Smith Jr. G | 24 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-4 |
| Melo Sanchez G | 22 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jay Rodgers G | 18 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-4 |
| Nico Ashley F | 18 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-2 |
| Gabe Spinelli G | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Jayden Mott F | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Elijah Parker G | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Roddy Jones G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Rashawn Tibby, Adam Fox, Ashton Reynolds, Daniel James, Corsley Edwards Jr.
| QUIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaden Zimmerman G | 34 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 6-17 | 4-11 |
| Asim Jones G | 34 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 4-10 | 1-2 |
| Amarri Monroe F | 33 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 9-17 | 0-4 |
| Grant Randall F | 27 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 6-11 | 2-5 |
| Spence Wewe F | 18 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nate Guerengomba G | 17 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-2 |
| Keith McKnight F | 15 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Braylan Ritvo F | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Samson Reilly G | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Ronell Giles Jr. G | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Akintola Akinniyi F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Sam Nosakhare, Christopher Skenderi, Tai Turnage, Jayden Reid
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketQUIN -9.5
ModelQUIN -8.6
Model edgeCCSU +0.9
L QUIN covered
Total
Market150.5
Model149.2
Model edgeUnder 1.3
W Under
Projected score
CCSU 70.3 · QUIN 78.9
CCSU 49 · QUIN 71
Win probability
QUIN 77%
1st half
Spread
QUIN -5.0
QUIN -10.0
Total
69.8
64 points
Projected score
CCSU 32.4 · QUIN 37.4
CCSU 27 · QUIN 37
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenQUIN -8.5
1 → QUIN
CloseQUIN -9.5
1 pt toward QUIN
Total
Open151.5
▼ 1
Close150.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
CCSU +340 · QUIN -450
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened QUIN -8.5 · closed QUIN -9.5 · moved 1 toward QUINmodel QUIN -8.5
model QUIN -8.5
Opened 151.5 · closed 150.5 · moved 1 downmodel 149
model 149
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CCSU 1–3 QUINQUIN leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · CCSU 4-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | QUIN 80 @ CCSU 84 | CCSU -2.5 | CCSU W |
| Nov 10, 2023-24 | CCSU 70 @ QUIN 74 | QUIN -8.5 | CCSU W |
| Nov 13, 2022-23 | QUIN 72 @ CCSU 70 | CCSU +7.5 | CCSU W |
| Nov 20, 2021-22 | CCSU 65 @ QUIN 76 | QUIN -13 | CCSU W |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Connecticut
30 games played
Straight up
23-7
77% wins
Against the spread
20-10
67% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 55-59 | +18.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 73-67 | +16.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 62-80 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 54-67 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 141.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 64-56 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 69-67 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 4 | @ | W 73-69 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 69-56 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 15 | @ | L 69-77 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 64-63 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 84-80 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 74-59 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 62-50 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 129.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 57-62 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 119.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 52-54 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 127.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 71-60 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-70 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 136.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 81-64 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 63-50 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 125.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 71-63 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 87-66 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 73-63 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-67 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 81-75 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 67-41 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | U 108 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 84-75 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 55-48 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 122.5 | U 103 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 86-67 | -13.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-72 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 43-46 | -11.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 89 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
PROV
L 55-59
+14.5
8
@
JOES
W 73-67
+22.5
16
vs
NE
L 62-80
−15.5
21
@
SHU
L 54-67
−15.5
24
vs
BING
W 64-56
+2.5
1
vs
UML
W 69-67
+6.5
4
@
MASS
W 73-69
+13.5
7
@
HC
W 69-56
+8.5
15
@
URI
L 69-77
+1.5
18
@
FAIR
W 64-63
−0.5
21
vs
QUIN
W 84-80
+1.5
3
@
SFPA
W 74-59
+9.5
5
@
MERC
W 62-50
+3.5
10
vs
WAG
L 57-62
−15.5
12
vs
LIU
L 52-54
−9.5
18
@
FDU
W 71-60
+5.5
24
@
LEM
W 93-70
+16.5
26
vs
CHST
W 81-64
+2.5
30
@
LIU
W 63-50
+8.5
1
@
STO
W 71-63
+3.5
6
vs
FDU
W 87-66
+11.5
13
vs
MERC
W 73-63
−2.5
15
vs
SFPA
W 83-67
+4.5
20
@
CHST
W 81-75
−5.5
22
vs
STO
W 67-41
+17.5
27
vs
LEM
W 84-75
−3.5
1
@
WAG
W 55-48
+0.5
5
vs
LEM
W 86-67
+5.5
8
vs
FDU
W 76-72
−5.5
11
vs
SFPA
L 43-46
−14.5
covered 20didn’t cover 10avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
PROV
L 55-59
−21.5
8
@
JOES
W 73-67
−4.5
16
vs
NE
L 62-80
+3.5
21
@
SHU
L 54-67
−20.5
24
vs
BING
W 64-56
−15.5
1
vs
UML
W 69-67
−7.5
4
@
MASS
W 73-69
+3.5
7
@
HC
W 69-56
−7.5
15
@
URI
L 69-77
+3.5
18
@
FAIR
W 64-63
−10.5
21
vs
QUIN
W 84-80
+28.5
3
@
SFPA
W 74-59
−3.5
5
@
MERC
W 62-50
−17.5
10
vs
WAG
L 57-62
−0.5
12
vs
LIU
L 52-54
−21.5
18
@
FDU
W 71-60
−8.5
24
@
LEM
W 93-70
+26.5
26
vs
CHST
W 81-64
+15.5
30
@
LIU
W 63-50
−12.5
1
@
STO
W 71-63
+3.5
6
vs
FDU
W 87-66
+13.5
13
vs
MERC
W 73-63
+3.5
15
vs
SFPA
W 83-67
+12.5
20
@
CHST
W 81-75
+19.5
22
vs
STO
W 67-41
−27.5
27
vs
LEM
W 84-75
+13.5
1
@
WAG
W 55-48
−19.5
5
vs
LEM
W 86-67
+8.5
8
vs
FDU
W 76-72
+9.5
11
vs
SFPA
L 43-46
−45.5
over 14under 16avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Quinnipiac
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
11-21
34% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 62-88 | +7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 73-96 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 58-55 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 74-63 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-80 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 67-81 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 74-88 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 72-67 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 83-73 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 69-70 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 80-84 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 75-69 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 59-46 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 62-69 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 72-53 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 63-62 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 81-76 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 91-57 | -3.5 | W +30.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 75-64 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-69 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 75-84 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 89-71 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 75-76 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 99-90 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 79-74 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 74-71 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-64 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 63-73 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 79-70 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 74-83 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-64 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 73-81 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
YALE
L 62-88
−18.5
9
@
SJU
L 73-96
−3.5
15
vs
ME
W 58-55
−2.5
19
@
NAVY
W 74-63
+8.5
23
@
UML
L 70-80
−4.5
25
@
SLU
L 67-81
−3.5
1
@
STO
L 74-88
−20.5
6
@
RID
W 72-67
+6.5
8
vs
SHU
W 83-73
+4.5
17
vs
HC
L 69-70
−11.5
21
@
CCSU
L 80-84
−1.5
29
vs
HOF
W 75-69
+7.5
3
@
SPU
W 59-46
+16.5
5
@
MRST
L 62-69
−5.5
10
vs
SIE
W 72-53
+12.5
12
@
IONA
W 63-62
−0.5
16
vs
MRMK
W 81-76
+0.5
18
@
MSM
W 91-57
+30.5
25
vs
RID
W 75-64
−0.5
31
vs
FAIR
W 81-69
−0.5
2
@
SIE
L 75-84
−14.5
6
vs
CAN
W 89-71
+1.5
8
vs
NIA
L 75-76
−12.5
14
@
SHU
W 99-90
+6.5
16
vs
IONA
W 79-74
−1.5
23
@
MAN
W 74-71
−1.5
28
vs
SPU
W 69-64
−5.5
2
@
MRMK
L 63-73
−11.5
6
vs
MSM
W 79-70
−0.5
8
@
FAIR
L 74-83
−10.5
12
vs
RID
W 78-64
+5.5
14
vs
IONA
L 73-81
−12.5
covered 11didn’t cover 21avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
YALE
L 62-88
+6.5
9
@
SJU
L 73-96
+12.5
15
vs
ME
W 58-55
−32.5
19
@
NAVY
W 74-63
−11.5
23
@
UML
L 70-80
−3.5
25
@
SLU
L 67-81
−10.5
1
@
STO
L 74-88
+22.5
6
@
RID
W 72-67
−3.5
8
vs
SHU
W 83-73
+4.5
17
vs
HC
L 69-70
−4.5
21
@
CCSU
L 80-84
+28.5
29
vs
HOF
W 75-69
+4.5
3
@
SPU
W 59-46
−34.5
5
@
MRST
L 62-69
−6.5
10
vs
SIE
W 72-53
−15.5
12
@
IONA
W 63-62
−20.5
16
vs
MRMK
W 81-76
+22.5
18
@
MSM
W 91-57
+1.5
25
vs
RID
W 75-64
−4.5
31
vs
FAIR
W 81-69
+4.5
2
@
SIE
L 75-84
+15.5
6
vs
CAN
W 89-71
+12.5
8
vs
NIA
L 75-76
+10.5
14
@
SHU
W 99-90
+32.5
16
vs
IONA
W 79-74
+2.5
23
@
MAN
W 74-71
−10.5
28
vs
SPU
W 69-64
−7.5
2
@
MRMK
L 63-73
−5.5
6
vs
MSM
W 79-70
−0.5
8
@
FAIR
L 74-83
+11.5
12
vs
RID
W 78-64
−1.5
14
vs
IONA
L 73-81
+9.5
over 16under 16avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
C Connecticut
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Quinnipiac
0-1 overall · 0-0 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's74–108
3 days since their last game.