Hilliard Center · at Texas A&M-CC · Conference game
Closing line
AMCC -7.5✓ AMCC covered by 5.5
Closing total136.5Over by 18.5
| This season | AMCC | |
|---|---|---|
| 9-20 | Record | 12-14 |
| 14-15 | ATS | 13-13 |
| 14-15 | O/U | 13-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ETAM 65–73 AMCC · ✓ AMCC (76%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETAM | 36 | 35 | 71 |
| AMCC | 37 | 47 | 84 |
1st half: ETAM 36, AMCC 37 (AMCC by 1). The model had AMCC by 4.7 and a total of 64.3 (actual 73).
Team stats
| ETAM | AMCC | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-50 52% | Field goals | 30-58 52% |
| 9-23 39% | 3-pointers | 8-22 36% |
| 10-21 48% | Free throws | 16-20 80% |
| 20 6 off | Rebounds | 36 13 off |
| 14 | Assists | 14 |
| 10 | Steals | 10 |
| 0 | Blocks | 4 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 44 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 14 |
Players
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Hunt G | 34 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 2-8 | 2-6 |
| Noah Pagotto F | 33 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 6-10 | 1-3 |
| Damian Garcia G | 27 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| Ronnie Harrison F | 20 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Tay Mosher F | 17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Josh Taylor F | 28 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| Vinny Sigona G | 26 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 4-8 |
| Evan Phelps G | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Alex McCray G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Kollin Tolbert, Parker Whisenhunt, London Fields, Kamren Robinson, Michael Folarin, Chris Adlam, Mykol Sanchez-Vega
| AMCC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Michelini-Jackson G | 30 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-4 |
| Nick Shogbonyo G | 28 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 5-11 | 4-9 |
| Cenker Evran F | 27 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Sheldon Williams F | 27 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 7-9 | 0-1 |
| D'Avian Houston G | 27 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Franck Yetna F | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-1 |
| Leo Torbor G | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Mason Gibson G | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-4 |
| Kobi Pearson F | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Kam Parker G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jamal Ambrose, Michael Oaks, Cedric Horton, Trenton Pane, Jaden Haire, Bryson Wheatfall, Kayden Crosby
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketAMCC -7.5
ModelAMCC -8.1
Model edgeAMCC +0.6
W AMCC covered
Total
Market136.5
Model137.2
Model edgeOver 0.7
W Over
Projected score
ETAM 64.6 · AMCC 72.6
ETAM 71 · AMCC 84
Win probability
AMCC 76%
1st half
Spread
AMCC -4.7
AMCC -1.0
Total
64.3
73 points
Projected score
ETAM 29.8 · AMCC 34.5
ETAM 36 · AMCC 37
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenAMCC -7.5
no move
CloseAMCC -7.5
No change since the open
Total
Open137.5
▼ 1
Close136.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
ETAM +320 · AMCC -410
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened AMCC -7.5 · unchangedmodel AMCC -8
model AMCC -8
Opened 137.5 · closed 136.5 · moved 1 downmodel 137
model 137
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
ETAM 1–5 AMCCAMCC leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · AMCC has won the last 5 meetings · ETAM 1-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2025-26 | AMCC 61 @ ETAM 50 | ETAM +3.5 | AMCC W |
| Feb 3, 2024-25 | AMCC 78 @ ETAM 66 | ETAM +7.5 | AMCC W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | ETAM 63 @ AMCC 86 | AMCC -8.5 | AMCC W |
| Jan 29, 2023-24 | AMCC 69 @ ETAM 54 | ETAM +2.5 | AMCC W |
| Mar 1, 2022-23 | AMCC 93 @ ETAM 88 | ETAM +4.5 | AMCC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Texas A&M
29 games played
Straight up
9-20
31% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 48-75 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 62-69 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 58-80 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 73-83 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-69 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 50-61 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 70-81 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 80-58 | +6.5 | W +28.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 61-82 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 85-94 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 74-68 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 52-48 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 100 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 70-74 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 54-97 | +13.5 | L −29.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 70-53 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-82 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 23 | vs | L 68-69 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 55-63 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
UNM
L 54-76
+0.5
10
@
HAW
L 74-100
−7.5
14
@
RICE
L 64-71
+3.5
24
@
FDU
W 70-65
+1.5
25
vs
ARMY
W 84-67
+14.5
5
@
CONN
L 59-83
+12.5
7
vs
CARK
W 75-68
+4.5
12
@
MCN
L 66-102
−15.5
15
@
SELA
W 70-69
+5.5
21
@
TA&M
L 77-118
−12.5
29
vs
SFA
L 48-75
−22.5
31
vs
LAM
L 62-69
−1.5
3
@
NICH
L 58-80
−15.5
5
@
NOLA
L 73-83
−3.5
10
vs
RGV
W 77-69
+11.5
12
vs
AMCC
L 50-61
−7.5
17
@
HCU
L 70-81
−8.5
19
@
UIW
W 80-58
+28.5
27
@
LAM
L 61-82
−14.5
31
vs
NICH
L 68-72
−5.5
2
vs
NOLA
L 85-94
−7.5
4
@
NWST
W 74-68
+9.5
7
vs
NWST
W 52-48
+2.5
9
@
SFA
L 70-74
+12.5
14
vs
MCN
L 54-97
−29.5
16
vs
SELA
W 70-53
+14.5
21
vs
UIW
L 73-82
−12.5
23
vs
HCU
L 68-69
−3.5
28
@
RGV
L 55-63
+2.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
UNM
L 54-76
−13.5
10
@
HAW
L 74-100
+28.5
14
@
RICE
L 64-71
−11.5
24
@
FDU
W 70-65
−14.5
25
vs
ARMY
W 84-67
+7.5
5
@
CONN
L 59-83
+0.5
7
vs
CARK
W 75-68
−2.5
12
@
MCN
L 66-102
+25.5
15
@
SELA
W 70-69
+1.5
21
@
TA&M
L 77-118
+28.5
29
vs
SFA
L 48-75
−23.5
31
vs
LAM
L 62-69
−12.5
3
@
NICH
L 58-80
−8.5
5
@
NOLA
L 73-83
+5.5
10
vs
RGV
W 77-69
+0.5
12
vs
AMCC
L 50-61
−31.5
17
@
HCU
L 70-81
+11.5
19
@
UIW
W 80-58
−4.5
27
@
LAM
L 61-82
+2.5
31
vs
NICH
L 68-72
−6.5
2
vs
NOLA
L 85-94
+27.5
4
@
NWST
W 74-68
−1.5
7
vs
NWST
W 52-48
−40.5
9
@
SFA
L 70-74
+0.5
14
vs
MCN
L 54-97
+8.5
16
vs
SELA
W 70-53
−13.5
21
vs
UIW
L 73-82
+9.5
23
vs
HCU
L 68-69
−1.5
28
@
RGV
L 55-63
−28.5
over 14under 15avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas A&M-CC
26 games played
Straight up
12-14
46% wins
Against the spread
13-13
50% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-13
50% overs · avg −1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 58-69 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 77-85 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 46-77 | +25.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 69-85 | +20.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 67-88 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 57-49 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 60-69 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 83-69 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 63-59 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 81-65 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 132.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 78-79 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 61-50 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 68-56 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 130.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 53-69 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-71 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 55-64 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-71 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 69-71 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 76-63 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 68-78 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-70 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 73-68 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-59 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
SMU
L 58-69
+12.5
8
@
TAR
L 77-85
−4.5
11
@
KU
L 46-77
−5.5
16
@
OKST
L 69-85
+4.5
28
@
XAV
L 67-88
−7.5
6
@
LAM
W 57-49
+11.5
17
@
SFA
L 60-69
−2.5
29
vs
NICH
L 71-76
−10.5
31
vs
NOLA
W 83-69
+9.5
3
@
RGV
W 63-59
+6.5
5
@
HCU
W 81-65
+12.5
10
@
NWST
L 78-79
−6.5
12
@
ETAM
W 61-50
+7.5
17
vs
SELA
W 68-56
+6.5
19
vs
MCN
L 53-69
−6.5
24
@
UIW
W 79-71
+9.5
26
vs
RGV
L 55-64
−11.5
31
vs
HCU
W 73-71
−5.5
2
vs
UIW
L 69-71
−6.5
7
@
NICH
W 83-76
+8.5
9
@
NOLA
L 78-84
−7.5
14
vs
LAM
W 76-63
+10.5
16
vs
SFA
L 68-78
−4.5
21
@
MCN
L 54-70
−1.5
23
@
SELA
W 73-68
+3.5
28
vs
NWST
W 71-59
+6.5
covered 13didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
SMU
L 58-69
−33.5
8
@
TAR
L 77-85
+19.5
11
@
KU
L 46-77
−22.5
16
@
OKST
L 69-85
−0.5
28
@
XAV
L 67-88
+8.5
6
@
LAM
W 57-49
−30.5
17
@
SFA
L 60-69
−10.5
29
vs
NICH
L 71-76
+9.5
31
vs
NOLA
W 83-69
+9.5
3
@
RGV
W 63-59
−15.5
5
@
HCU
W 81-65
+13.5
10
@
NWST
L 78-79
+18.5
12
@
ETAM
W 61-50
−31.5
17
vs
SELA
W 68-56
−6.5
19
vs
MCN
L 53-69
−18.5
24
@
UIW
W 79-71
+13.5
26
vs
RGV
L 55-64
−16.5
31
vs
HCU
W 73-71
+8.5
2
vs
UIW
L 69-71
−0.5
7
@
NICH
W 83-76
+21.5
9
@
NOLA
L 78-84
+15.5
14
vs
LAM
W 76-63
+3.5
16
vs
SFA
L 68-78
+10.5
21
@
MCN
L 54-70
−15.5
23
@
SELA
W 73-68
+10.5
28
vs
NWST
W 71-59
−4.5
over 13under 13avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Texas A&M
9-20 overall · 6-15 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UT Rio Grande55–63
- Lvs Hou Christian68–69
- Lvs Incarnate Word73–82
- Wvs SE Louisiana70–53
- Lvs McNeese54–97
2 days since their last game.
Texas A&M-CC
12-14 overall · 12-9 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs N'Western St71–59
- W@ SE Louisiana73–68
- L@ McNeese54–70
- Lvs SF Austin68–78
- Wvs Lamar76–63
2 days since their last game.