The Field House · at East Texas A&M · Conference game
Closing line
LAM -5.5✓ LAM covered by 1.5
LAM -5.5✓ LAM covered by 1.5Closing total143.5Under by 12.5
| LAM | This season | ETAM |
|---|---|---|
| 4-6 | Record | 4-7 |
| 4-6 | ATS | 7-4 |
| 5-5 | O/U | 6-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LAM 71–69 ETAM · ✓ LAM (57%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM | 25 | 44 | 69 |
| ETAM | 34 | 28 | 62 |
1st half: LAM 25, ETAM 34 (ETAM by 9). The model had LAM by 1.4 and a total of 65.8 (actual 59).
Team stats
| LAM | ETAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-64 41% | Field goals | 19-51 37% |
| 5-16 31% | 3-pointers | 10-29 34% |
| 12-17 71% | Free throws | 14-16 88% |
| 38 14 off | Rebounds | 34 9 off |
| 12 | Assists | 13 |
| 7 | Steals | 8 |
| 4 | Blocks | 4 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 13 | Fouls | 20 |
| 34 | Points in paint | 18 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 11 |
Players
| LAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Holifield F | 30 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-6 |
| King-Njhsanni Wilhite G | 28 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-2 |
| Rob Lee Jr. G | 21 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-3 |
| Braden East F | 20 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
| Cody Pennebaker G | 18 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Eian Lowe G | 24 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Errol White F | 24 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Janko Bulajic C | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| B.B. Knight G | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Jayden Gambrell G | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
Did not play: Jayden Barrs, Quinton Sanders, Christian Thomas, Spencer Ezewiro, Izuchukwu Emelife
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Hunt G | 30 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4-8 | 2-5 |
| Damian Garcia G | 29 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-5 |
| London Fields G | 27 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-6 |
| Ronnie Harrison F | 27 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 6-11 | 2-5 |
| Michael Folarin F | 17 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Noah Pagotto F | 26 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Vinny Sigona G | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 |
| Josh Taylor F | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Evan Phelps G | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Tay Mosher F | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
Did not play: Mykol Sanchez-Vega, Chris Adlam, Kamren Robinson, Parker Whisenhunt, Alex McCray, Kollin Tolbert
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLAM -5.5
ModelLAM -2.1
Model edgeETAM +3.4
L LAM covered
Total
Market143.5
Model140.5
Model edgeUnder 3.0
W Under
Projected score
LAM 71.3 · ETAM 69.2
LAM 69 · ETAM 62
Win probability
LAM 57%
1st half
Spread
LAM -1.4
ETAM -9.0
Total
65.8
59 points
Projected score
LAM 33.6 · ETAM 32.2
LAM 25 · ETAM 34
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLAM -2.5
3 → LAM
CloseLAM -5.5
3 pts toward LAM
Total
Open143.5
no move
Close143.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
LAM -250 · ETAM +205
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LAM -2.5 · closed LAM -5.5 · moved 3 toward LAMmodel LAM -2
model LAM -2
Opened 143.5 · unchangedmodel 140.5
model 140.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
| ETAM | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
LAM 4–2 ETAMLAM leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · LAM has won the last 4 meetings · LAM 4-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | LAM 65 @ ETAM 55 | ETAM +5.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | ETAM 58 @ LAM 61 | LAM -9.5 | ETAM W |
| Mar 4, 2023-24 | LAM 70 @ ETAM 53 | ETAM +4.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 22, 2023-24 | ETAM 65 @ LAM 76 | LAM -5.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 26, 2022-23 | ETAM 62 @ LAM 57 | LAM +5.5 | LAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lamar
10 games played
Straight up
4-6
40% wins
Against the spread
4-6
40% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-5
50% overs · avg +0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ TCU | L 65-78 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 17 | @ ULM | W 79-66 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 23 | @ MONT | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 24 | vs OAK | L 68-83 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs UL | W 65-55 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 6 | vs AMCC | L 49-57 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 10 | @ SDSU | L 71-89 | +17.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | vs RGV | L 72-83 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs OMA | L 82-85 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 29 | @ NWST | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@TCU
TCUL 65-78
+5.5
17
@ULM
ULMW 79-66
+1.5
23
@MONT
MONTW 68-63
+9.5
24
vsOAK
OAKL 68-83
−11.5
3
vsUL
ULW 65-55
−0.5
6
vsAMCC
AMCCL 49-57
−11.5
10
@SDSU
SDSUL 71-89
−0.5
16
vsRGV
RGVL 72-83
−14.5
20
vsOMA
OMAL 82-85
−8.5
29
@NWST
NWSTW 76-61
+11.5
covered 4didn’t cover 6avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@TCU
TCUL 65-78
−4.5
17
@ULM
ULMW 79-66
+4.5
23
@MONT
MONTW 68-63
−17.5
24
vsOAK
OAKL 68-83
+2.5
3
vsUL
ULW 65-55
−9.5
6
vsAMCC
AMCCL 49-57
−30.5
10
@SDSU
SDSUL 71-89
+24.5
16
vsRGV
RGVL 72-83
+15.5
20
vsOMA
OMAL 82-85
+25.5
29
@NWST
NWSTW 76-61
−1.5
over 5under 5avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
East Texas A&M
11 games played
Straight up
4-7
36% wins
Against the spread
7-4
64% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-5
55% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ UNM | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ HAW | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @ RICE | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ FDU | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs ARMY | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ CONN | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs CARK | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ MCN | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ SELA | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ TA&M | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs SFA | L 48-75 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
+0.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
−7.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
+3.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
+1.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+14.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+12.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
+4.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
−15.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+5.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
−12.5
29
vsSFA
SFAL 48-75
−22.5
covered 7didn’t cover 4avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
−13.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
+28.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
−11.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
−14.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+7.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+0.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
−2.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
+25.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+1.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
+28.5
29
vsSFA
SFAL 48-75
−23.5
over 6under 5avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Lamar
4-6 overall · 1-2 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ N'Western St76–61
- Lvs Omaha82–85
- Lvs UT Rio Grande72–83
- L@ San Diego St71–89
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC49–57
2 days since their last game.
East Texas A&M
4-7 overall · 1-2 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SF Austin48–75
- L@ Texas A&M77–118
- W@ SE Louisiana70–69
- L@ McNeese66–102
- Wvs C Arkansas75–68
2 days since their last game.