Pinnacle Bank Arena · at Nebraska
Closing line
NEB -21.5✓ NEB covered by 8.5
Closing total156.5Over by 5.5
| This season | NEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 1-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 1-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: FIU 66–85 NEB · ✓ NEB (95%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIU | 28 | 38 | 66 |
| NEB | 49 | 47 | 96 |
1st half: FIU 28, NEB 49 (NEB by 21). The model had NEB by 11.6 and a total of 70.5 (actual 77).
Team stats
| FIU | NEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-71 39% | Field goals | 37-67 55% |
| 6-23 26% | 3-pointers | 17-34 50% |
| 4-6 67% | Free throws | 5-8 63% |
| 40 17 off | Rebounds | 36 9 off |
| 13 | Assists | 29 |
| 9 | Steals | 11 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |
| 20 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 13 | Fouls | 10 |
| 38 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 8 | Fast-break points | 5 |
Players
| FIU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zawdie Jackson G | 29 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-3 |
| Hamed Olayinka F | 28 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 6-7 | 0-1 |
| Eric Dibami C | 25 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
| Corey Stephenson G | 25 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 5-13 | 1-4 |
| Ashton Williamson G | 18 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Julian Mackey G | 22 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-4 |
| Thiago Sucatzky G | 19 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 2-3 |
| Brit Harris G | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-5 |
| Ibrahim Olajuwon C | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Kennedy Brown F | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Amarion Nimmers G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Renato Ruiz, Mikey Kelvin II, Gvidas Gicevicius, Jorge Santos
| NEB | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rienk Mast F | 25 | 18 | 12 | 10 | 8-10 | 2-3 |
| Sam Hoiberg G | 24 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Pryce Sandfort F | 21 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 7-11 | 6-9 |
| Berke Buyuktuncel C | 20 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-3 |
| Jamarques Lawrence G | 16 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Braden Frager F | 22 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 3-6 |
| Connor Essegian G | 20 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 5-8 | 3-5 |
| Cale Jacobsen G | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Jared Garcia F | 15 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Kendall Blue G | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Leo Curtis F | 7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Justin Bolis F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Ugnius Jarusevicius, Will Cooper, Quentin Rhymes, Henry Burt
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketNEB -21.5
ModelNEB -19.3
Model edgeFIU +2.2
L NEB covered
Total
Market156.5
Model150.6
Model edgeUnder 5.9
L Over
Projected score
FIU 65.6 · NEB 85
FIU 66 · NEB 96
Win probability
NEB 95%
1st half
Spread
NEB -11.6
NEB -21.0
Total
70.5
77 points
Projected score
FIU 29.5 · NEB 41
FIU 28 · NEB 49
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenNEB -16.5
5 → NEB
CloseNEB -21.5
5 pts toward NEB
Total
Open154.5
▲ 2
Close156.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
FIU +2500 · NEB -10000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened NEB -16.5 · closed NEB -21.5 · moved 5 toward NEBmodel NEB -19.5
model NEB -19.5
Opened 154.5 · closed 156.5 · moved 2 upmodel 150.5
model 150.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 2-8 20% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
FIU
31 games played
Straight up
8-23
26% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-20
35% overs · avg −4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 70-77 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 75-80 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 70-75 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 58-60 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 76-73 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 59-60 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 4 | vs | L 77-88 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 81-72 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-75 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 75-69 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-66 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 69-73 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 85-66 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 64-81 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 74-81 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 16 | vs | L 52-59 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 25 | vs | L 59-82 | +5.5 | L −17.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 67-71 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 67-73 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +0.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 71-82 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 63-77 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 48-76 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 45-58 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 103 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 76-61 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 79-84 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 67-76 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 56-78 | +11.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 64-61 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 56-65 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
RICE
L 70-77
−0.5
9
@
SUU
L 75-80
+1.5
18
vs
HOW
L 70-75
−9.5
22
vs
NE
L 58-60
+2.5
23
vs
CSUB
W 76-73
+1.5
24
@
FGCU
L 59-60
+3.5
4
vs
FAU
L 77-88
−1.5
14
@
STET
W 81-72
+5.5
17
@
ECU
L 64-75
−3.5
21
vs
IUIN
W 75-69
−2.5
30
vs
UTU
W 80-66
+8.5
2
vs
MTSU
L 69-73
−0.5
4
vs
WKU
W 85-66
+23.5
9
@
LT
L 64-81
−9.5
11
@
SHSU
L 74-81
+1.5
16
vs
NMSU
L 52-59
−3.5
18
vs
UTEP
L 73-81
−5.5
25
vs
LIB
L 59-82
−17.5
30
@
JXST
L 67-71
+2.5
1
@
KENN
L 67-73
+1.5
6
vs
SHSU
W 85-82
+3.5
8
vs
LT
L 71-82
−7.5
13
@
UTEP
L 63-77
−4.5
15
@
NMSU
L 48-76
−21.5
22
@
LIB
L 45-58
+0.5
27
vs
KENN
W 76-61
+19.5
1
vs
JXST
L 79-84
−1.5
6
@
WKU
L 67-76
−1.5
8
@
MTSU
L 56-78
−10.5
11
vs
WKU
W 64-61
+7.5
12
vs
JXST
L 56-65
−1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
RICE
L 70-77
−4.5
9
@
SUU
L 75-80
−5.5
18
vs
HOW
L 70-75
−10.5
22
vs
NE
L 58-60
−30.5
23
vs
CSUB
W 76-73
+6.5
24
@
FGCU
L 59-60
−15.5
4
vs
FAU
L 77-88
+6.5
14
@
STET
W 81-72
+5.5
17
@
ECU
L 64-75
−4.5
21
vs
IUIN
W 75-69
+0.5
30
vs
UTU
W 80-66
−1.5
2
vs
MTSU
L 69-73
−8.5
4
vs
WKU
W 85-66
−3.5
9
@
LT
L 64-81
+5.5
11
@
SHSU
L 74-81
+2.5
16
vs
NMSU
L 52-59
−31.5
18
vs
UTEP
L 73-81
+15.5
25
vs
LIB
L 59-82
+2.5
30
@
JXST
L 67-71
−2.5
1
@
KENN
L 67-73
−13.5
6
vs
SHSU
W 85-82
+22.5
8
vs
LT
L 71-82
+15.5
13
@
UTEP
L 63-77
−2.5
15
@
NMSU
L 48-76
−15.5
22
@
LIB
L 45-58
−35.5
27
vs
KENN
W 76-61
−9.5
1
vs
JXST
L 79-84
+25.5
6
@
WKU
L 67-76
−1.5
8
@
MTSU
L 56-78
−11.5
11
vs
WKU
W 64-61
−19.5
12
vs
JXST
L 56-65
−11.5
over 11under 20avg −4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Nebraska
35 games played
Straight up
21-14
60% wins
Against the spread
20-15
57% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-19
46% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 87-67 | -23.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 63-58 | -23.5 | L −18.5 | 154.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-60 | -27.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 74-77 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 74-63 | +9.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 96-79 | -22.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 103-72 | -17.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 52-89 | +6.5 | L −30.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-68 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 66-49 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 23 | @ | W 69-55 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 25 | vs | W 78-66 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 77-43 | -21.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 87-97 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 68-104 | +8.5 | L −27.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 16 | vs | L 82-85 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 66-69 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 73-78 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 55-83 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 80-74 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 86-72 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 79-71 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 75-83 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 68-64 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 72-89 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 46-49 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 95 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-67 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 114-116 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 230 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 68-83 | -7.5 | L −22.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 31 | vs | W 86-78 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 81-69 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 150 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Apr 6 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
RGV
W 87-67
−3.5
9
vs
BCU
W 63-58
−18.5
13
vs
FDU
W 86-60
−1.5
17
vs
SMC
L 74-77
+0.5
22
@
CREI
W 74-63
+20.5
27
vs
SDAK
W 96-79
−5.5
1
vs
UNF
W 103-72
+13.5
7
@
MSU
L 52-89
−30.5
13
vs
IU
W 85-68
+13.5
22
vs
MUR
W 66-49
+9.5
23
@
HAW
W 69-55
+5.5
25
vs
ORST
W 78-66
+6.5
30
vs
SOU
W 77-43
+12.5
4
vs
UCLA
W 66-58
+5.5
7
@
IOWA
L 87-97
−5.5
12
@
PUR
L 68-104
−27.5
16
vs
RUTG
L 82-85
−11.5
19
@
MD
L 66-69
+6.5
22
vs
USC
L 73-78
−11.5
26
@
WIS
L 55-83
−20.5
30
vs
ILL
W 80-74
+10.5
2
@
ORE
W 77-71
+12.5
5
@
WASH
W 86-72
+12.5
9
vs
OSU
W 79-71
+5.5
13
vs
MD
L 75-83
−9.5
16
@
NU
W 68-64
+2.5
19
@
PSU
L 72-89
−18.5
24
vs
MICH
L 46-49
−1.5
1
vs
MINN
L 65-67
−9.5
4
@
OSU
L 114-116
+4.5
9
vs
IOWA
L 68-83
−22.5
31
vs
ASU
W 86-78
+1.5
2
vs
GTWN
W 81-69
+1.5
5
vs
BOIS
W 79-69
+13.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-66
+7.5
covered 20didn’t cover 15avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
RGV
W 87-67
+5.5
9
vs
BCU
W 63-58
−33.5
13
vs
FDU
W 86-60
−12.5
17
vs
SMC
L 74-77
+11.5
22
@
CREI
W 74-63
−14.5
27
vs
SDAK
W 96-79
+17.5
1
vs
UNF
W 103-72
+16.5
7
@
MSU
L 52-89
−6.5
13
vs
IU
W 85-68
−3.5
22
vs
MUR
W 66-49
−30.5
23
@
HAW
W 69-55
−16.5
25
vs
ORST
W 78-66
+6.5
30
vs
SOU
W 77-43
−21.5
4
vs
UCLA
W 66-58
−10.5
7
@
IOWA
L 87-97
+24.5
12
@
PUR
L 68-104
+31.5
16
vs
RUTG
L 82-85
+21.5
19
@
MD
L 66-69
−12.5
22
vs
USC
L 73-78
+7.5
26
@
WIS
L 55-83
−11.5
30
vs
ILL
W 80-74
−2.5
2
@
ORE
W 77-71
+0.5
5
@
WASH
W 86-72
+15.5
9
vs
OSU
W 79-71
+5.5
13
vs
MD
L 75-83
+8.5
16
@
NU
W 68-64
−10.5
19
@
PSU
L 72-89
+10.5
24
vs
MICH
L 46-49
−56.5
1
vs
MINN
L 65-67
−3.5
4
@
OSU
L 114-116
+86.5
9
vs
IOWA
L 68-83
−4.5
31
vs
ASU
W 86-78
+8.5
2
vs
GTWN
W 81-69
−7.5
5
vs
BOIS
W 79-69
−6.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-66
−17.5
over 16under 19avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
FIU
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Nebraska
1-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs West Georgia86–53
5 days since their last game.