Chaifetz Arena · at Saint Louis
Closing line
SLU -19.5✓ SLU covered by 5.5
Closing total153.5Over by 5.5
| This season | SLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SEMO 64–82 SLU · ✓ SLU (93%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEMO | 35 | 32 | 67 |
| SLU | 44 | 48 | 92 |
1st half: SEMO 35, SLU 44 (SLU by 9). The model had SLU by 10.3 and a total of 68.4 (actual 79).
Team stats
| SEMO | SLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-62 35% | Field goals | 33-67 49% |
| 5-20 25% | 3-pointers | 9-29 31% |
| 18-26 69% | Free throws | 17-21 81% |
| 29 7 off | Rebounds | 54 14 off |
| 7 | Assists | 10 |
| 6 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 19 | Fouls | 24 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 48 |
| 8 | Fast-break points | 20 |
Players
| SEMO | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ Ward G | 32 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 5-14 | 2-4 |
| Braxton Stacker G | 30 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| Brendan Terry F | 26 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 5-13 | 0-1 |
| Luke Almodovar G | 23 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Troy Cole Jr. G | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Landren Blocker G | 24 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 |
| Marqueas Bell G | 22 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-1 |
| Elliot Lowndes F | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| PJ Farmer G | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| David Idada C | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jay Reynolds G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Trace Sadler F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Saxton Hoepker, Blaize Sagna
| SLU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robbie Avila C | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 6-13 | 3-7 |
| Quentin Jones G | 26 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-2 |
| Dion Brown G | 21 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 5-7 | 1-1 |
| Trey Green G | 20 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-7 |
| Amari McCottry G | 19 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 7-8 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Brady Dunlap F | 21 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Ishan Sharma F | 21 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Kellen Thames G | 19 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-1 |
| Paul Otieno F | 13 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| Jax Kerr F | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Cam Hutson G | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Dylan Warlick, Kalu Anya, Luke Laczkowski, Badara Diakite, Isaac Holmes, Jaden Schertz
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSLU -18.5
1 → SLU
CloseSLU -19.5
1 pt toward SLU
Total
Open148.5
▲ 5
Close153.5
Up 5 since the open
Moneyline
SEMO +1000 · SLU -2000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SLU -18.5 · closed SLU -19.5 · moved 1 toward SLUmodel SLU -17
model SLU -17
Opened 148.5 · closed 153.5 · moved 5 upmodel 146
model 146
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SLU -19.5 | SLU -17.2 | SEMO +2.3 | L SLU covered |
| Total | 153.5 | 146.1 | Under 7.4 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | SEMO 64.4 · SLU 81.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SLU -10.3 | SLU -9.0 |
| 1H total | 68.4 | 79 |
| 1H projected score | SEMO 29 · SLU 39.4 | SEMO 35 · SLU 44 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SE Missouri
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
20-10
67% covers · avg +4.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 60-88 | +20.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 76-85 | +26.5 | W +17.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 82-87 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 77-73 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 64-72 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 80-59 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 60-78 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 53-73 | +15.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 79-72 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 80-64 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 67-65 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 63-66 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 77-66 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 56-67 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 71-73 | -0.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 16 | @ | W 77-70 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 68-72 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 25 | @ | W 72-51 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 132.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 90-79 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 89-87 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 80-51 | +3.5 | W +32.5 | 133.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 79-74 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 57-45 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 136.5 | U 102 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-69 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 87-66 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 74-58 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 83-68 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 58-73 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 136.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 78-59 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 48-69 | -3.5 | L −24.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
BRAD
L 60-88
−7.5
10
@
VAN
L 76-85
+17.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-87
+3.5
21
@
CARK
W 77-73
+5.5
22
vs
UNCA
L 64-72
+0.5
30
vs
KC
W 80-59
+23.5
5
@
LIP
L 60-78
−1.5
8
@
MUR
L 53-73
−4.5
19
vs
EIU
W 79-72
+2.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 80-64
+17.5
2
@
TNST
W 67-65
+4.5
4
@
UTM
L 63-66
−0.5
9
vs
USI
W 77-66
+3.5
11
vs
MORE
L 56-67
−14.5
14
vs
LR
L 71-73
−2.5
16
@
TNTC
W 77-70
+8.5
23
@
LIN
L 68-72
−5.5
25
@
WIU
W 72-51
+17.5
30
vs
UTM
W 90-79
+7.5
1
vs
TNST
W 89-87
−2.5
6
@
MORE
W 80-51
+32.5
8
@
USI
W 79-74
+1.5
11
@
LR
W 57-45
+16.5
15
vs
TNTC
W 83-69
+7.5
20
vs
WIU
W 87-66
+9.5
22
vs
LIN
W 74-58
+6.5
27
@
SIUE
W 83-68
+18.5
1
@
EIU
L 58-73
−20.5
7
vs
LR
W 78-59
+16.5
8
vs
SIUE
L 48-69
−24.5
covered 20didn’t cover 10avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
BRAD
L 60-88
+6.5
10
@
VAN
L 76-85
+5.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-87
+23.5
21
@
CARK
W 77-73
+0.5
22
vs
UNCA
L 64-72
−11.5
30
vs
KC
W 80-59
+1.5
5
@
LIP
L 60-78
−8.5
8
@
MUR
L 53-73
−20.5
19
vs
EIU
W 79-72
+10.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 80-64
+3.5
2
@
TNST
W 67-65
−20.5
4
@
UTM
L 63-66
−12.5
9
vs
USI
W 77-66
+2.5
11
vs
MORE
L 56-67
−14.5
14
vs
LR
L 71-73
+8.5
16
@
TNTC
W 77-70
+4.5
23
@
LIN
L 68-72
−1.5
25
@
WIU
W 72-51
−9.5
30
vs
UTM
W 90-79
+26.5
1
vs
TNST
W 89-87
+26.5
6
@
MORE
W 80-51
−2.5
8
@
USI
W 79-74
+11.5
11
@
LR
W 57-45
−34.5
15
vs
TNTC
W 83-69
+8.5
20
vs
WIU
W 87-66
+14.5
22
vs
LIN
W 74-58
−13.5
27
@
SIUE
W 83-68
+10.5
1
@
EIU
L 58-73
−5.5
7
vs
LR
W 78-59
−0.5
8
vs
SIUE
L 48-69
−18.5
over 16under 14avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Louis
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-22
31% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 78-85 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 77-71 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 63-88 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-67 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 93-90 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 74-66 | -19.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 61-78 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 85-62 | -25.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 15 | @ | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 71-74 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 72-73 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 88-63 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 73-57 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-78 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 63-59 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 64-52 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 61-67 | +0.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 78-69 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 63-71 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 63-76 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-78 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 81-66 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 57-56 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 98-67 | -2.5 | W +28.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 67-75 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 90-88 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 83-75 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-72 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 78-103 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 154.5 | O 181 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
SCU
L 78-85
−5.5
16
vs
LMU
W 77-71
−0.5
22
vs
WICH
L 63-88
−21.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 81-67
+3.5
27
vs
UML
W 93-90
−7.5
2
vs
JKST
W 74-66
−11.5
5
@
SF
L 61-78
−8.5
8
vs
CHST
W 85-62
−2.5
15
@
ILST
L 77-81
−5.5
18
vs
WOF
L 71-74
−10.5
22
@
GCU
L 72-73
+8.5
31
@
FOR
W 88-63
+23.5
3
vs
JOES
W 73-57
+13.5
8
vs
SBU
W 73-68
+1.5
14
@
VCU
L 62-78
−5.5
18
@
RICH
W 63-59
−2.5
22
vs
LAS
W 64-52
+1.5
25
@
GW
L 61-67
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
W 78-69
+14.5
31
vs
DAY
L 63-71
−10.5
4
@
MASS
W 73-71
+0.5
7
@
JOES
L 63-76
−6.5
11
vs
GMU
L 74-76
−3.5
14
@
LUC
L 69-78
−6.5
22
vs
URI
W 81-66
+8.5
25
@
DAV
W 57-56
+2.5
1
vs
LUC
W 98-67
+28.5
4
@
DAY
L 67-75
−1.5
8
vs
DUQ
W 90-88
−4.5
13
vs
DAV
W 83-75
+4.5
14
vs
LUC
L 64-72
−6.5
18
@
ARST
L 78-103
−19.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
SCU
L 78-85
+5.5
16
vs
LMU
W 77-71
−6.5
22
vs
WICH
L 63-88
−3.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 81-67
−10.5
27
vs
UML
W 93-90
+20.5
2
vs
JKST
W 74-66
−14.5
5
@
SF
L 61-78
−12.5
8
vs
CHST
W 85-62
−7.5
15
@
ILST
L 77-81
+9.5
18
vs
WOF
L 71-74
−5.5
22
@
GCU
L 72-73
−10.5
31
@
FOR
W 88-63
−3.5
3
vs
JOES
W 73-57
−21.5
8
vs
SBU
W 73-68
−1.5
14
@
VCU
L 62-78
−6.5
18
@
RICH
W 63-59
−14.5
22
vs
LAS
W 64-52
−36.5
25
@
GW
L 61-67
−20.5
28
vs
VCU
W 78-69
+1.5
31
vs
DAY
L 63-71
−9.5
4
@
MASS
W 73-71
−8.5
7
@
JOES
L 63-76
−5.5
11
vs
GMU
L 74-76
+16.5
14
@
LUC
L 69-78
+6.5
22
vs
URI
W 81-66
−5.5
25
@
DAV
W 57-56
−34.5
1
vs
LUC
W 98-67
+22.5
4
@
DAY
L 67-75
−2.5
8
vs
DUQ
W 90-88
+39.5
13
vs
DAV
W 83-75
+15.5
14
vs
LUC
L 64-72
−5.5
18
@
ARST
L 78-103
+26.5
over 10under 22avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SE Missouri
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Saint Louis
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.