The Field House · at East Texas A&M · Conference game
Closing line
AMCC -3.5✓ AMCC covered by 7.5
AMCC -3.5✓ AMCC covered by 7.5Closing total142.5Under by 31.5
| AMCC | This season | ETAM |
|---|---|---|
| 4-8 | Record | 5-10 |
| 6-6 | ATS | 8-7 |
| 6-6 | O/U | 8-7 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: AMCC 72–68 ETAM · ✓ AMCC (65%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMCC | 33 | 28 | 61 |
| ETAM | 29 | 21 | 50 |
1st half: AMCC 33, ETAM 29 (AMCC by 4). The model had AMCC by 2.8 and a total of 65.3 (actual 62).
Team stats
| AMCC | ETAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-49 43% | Field goals | 18-55 33% |
| 3-14 21% | 3-pointers | 1-20 5% |
| 16-24 67% | Free throws | 13-22 59% |
| 38 9 off | Rebounds | 35 12 off |
| 8 | Assists | 11 |
| 6 | Steals | 9 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 19 | Fouls | 19 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| AMCC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Shogbonyo G | 31 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 4-11 | 0-3 |
| Sheldon Williams F | 28 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| Leo Torbor G | 26 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| Mason Gibson G | 25 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 |
| Franck Yetna F | 25 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| D'Avian Houston G | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-5 |
| Bryson Wheatfall G | 19 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-0 |
| Kobi Pearson F | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jaden Haire F | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Cenker Evran F | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Cedric Horton, Trenton Pane, Daniel Michelini-Jackson, Kayden Crosby, Jamal Ambrose, Michael Oaks, Kam Parker
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Pagotto F | 37 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Ronnie Harrison F | 37 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-2 |
| Gianni Hunt G | 35 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-5 |
| Damian Garcia G | 31 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3-12 | 0-5 |
| Tay Mosher F | 30 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1-9 | 0-7 |
| Bench | ||||||
| London Fields G | 12 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Josh Taylor F | 11 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Alex McCray G | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Kamren Robinson, Parker Whisenhunt, Michael Folarin, Vinny Sigona, Chris Adlam, Mykol Sanchez-Vega, Kollin Tolbert, Evan Phelps
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketAMCC -3.5
ModelAMCC -4.4
Model edgeAMCC +0.9
W AMCC covered
Total
Market142.5
Model139.4
Model edgeUnder 3.1
W Under
Projected score
AMCC 71.9 · ETAM 67.5
AMCC 61 · ETAM 50
Win probability
AMCC 65%
1st half
Spread
AMCC -2.8
AMCC -4.0
Total
65.3
62 points
Projected score
AMCC 34 · ETAM 31.3
AMCC 33 · ETAM 29
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenAMCC -4.5
1 → ETAM
CloseAMCC -3.5
1 pt toward ETAM
Total
Open139.5
▲ 3
Close142.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
AMCC -205 · ETAM +170
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened AMCC -4.5 · closed AMCC -3.5 · moved 1 toward ETAMmodel AMCC -4.5
model AMCC -4.5
Opened 139.5 · closed 142.5 · moved 3 upmodel 139.5
model 139.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMCC | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
| ETAM | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
AMCC 4–1 ETAMAMCC leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · AMCC has won the last 4 meetings · AMCC 4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2024-25 | AMCC 78 @ ETAM 66 | ETAM +7.5 | AMCC W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | ETAM 63 @ AMCC 86 | AMCC -8.5 | AMCC W |
| Jan 29, 2023-24 | AMCC 69 @ ETAM 54 | ETAM +2.5 | AMCC W |
| Mar 1, 2022-23 | AMCC 93 @ ETAM 88 | ETAM +4.5 | AMCC W |
| Feb 23, 2022-23 | ETAM 84 @ AMCC 80 | AMCC -11.5 | ETAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas A&M-CC
12 games played
Straight up
4-8
33% wins
Against the spread
6-6
50% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-6
50% overs · avg −2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ SMU | L 58-69 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | @ TAR | L 77-85 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ KU | L 46-77 | +25.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | @ OKST | L 69-85 | +20.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 28 | @ XAV | L 67-88 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ LAM | W 57-49 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 17 | @ SFA | L 60-69 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 29 | vs NICH | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | vs NOLA | W 83-69 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ RGV | W 63-59 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 5 | @ HCU | W 81-65 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 132.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ NWST | L 78-79 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@SMU
SMUL 58-69
+12.5
8
@TAR
TARL 77-85
−4.5
11
@KU
KUL 46-77
−5.5
16
@OKST
OKSTL 69-85
+4.5
28
@XAV
XAVL 67-88
−7.5
6
@LAM
LAMW 57-49
+11.5
17
@SFA
SFAL 60-69
−2.5
29
vsNICH
NICHL 71-76
−10.5
31
vsNOLA
NOLAW 83-69
+9.5
3
@RGV
RGVW 63-59
+6.5
5
@HCU
HCUW 81-65
+12.5
10
@NWST
NWSTL 78-79
−6.5
covered 6didn’t cover 6avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@SMU
SMUL 58-69
−33.5
8
@TAR
TARL 77-85
+19.5
11
@KU
KUL 46-77
−22.5
16
@OKST
OKSTL 69-85
−0.5
28
@XAV
XAVL 67-88
+8.5
6
@LAM
LAMW 57-49
−30.5
17
@SFA
SFAL 60-69
−10.5
29
vsNICH
NICHL 71-76
+9.5
31
vsNOLA
NOLAW 83-69
+9.5
3
@RGV
RGVW 63-59
−15.5
5
@HCU
HCUW 81-65
+13.5
10
@NWST
NWSTL 78-79
+18.5
over 6under 6avg −2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
East Texas A&M
15 games played
Straight up
5-10
33% wins
Against the spread
8-7
53% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-7
53% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ UNM | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ HAW | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @ RICE | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ FDU | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs ARMY | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ CONN | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs CARK | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ MCN | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ SELA | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ TA&M | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vsSFA | L 48-75 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | vsLAM | L 62-69 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 3 | @NICH | L 58-80 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | @NOLA | L 73-83 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vsRGV | W 77-69 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
+0.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
−7.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
+3.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
+1.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+14.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+12.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
+4.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
−15.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+5.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
−12.5
29
vsSFA
SFAL 48-75
−22.5
31
vsLAM
LAML 62-69
−1.5
3
@NICH
NICHL 58-80
−15.5
5
@NOLA
NOLAL 73-83
−3.5
10
vsRGV
RGVW 77-69
+11.5
covered 8didn’t cover 7avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
−13.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
+28.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
−11.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
−14.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+7.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+0.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
−2.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
+25.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+1.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
+28.5
29
vsSFA
SFAL 48-75
−23.5
31
vsLAM
LAML 62-69
−12.5
3
@NICH
NICHL 58-80
−8.5
5
@NOLA
NOLAL 73-83
+5.5
10
vsRGV
RGVW 77-69
+0.5
over 8under 7avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas A&M-CC
4-8 overall · 4-3 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ N'Western St78–79
- W@ Hou Christian81–65
- W@ UT Rio Grande63–59
- Wvs LSU N Orleans83–69
- Lvs Nicholls71–76
2 days since their last game.
East Texas A&M
5-10 overall · 2-5 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UT Rio Grande77–69
- L@ LSU N Orleans73–83
- L@ Nicholls58–80
- Lvs Lamar62–69
- Lvs SF Austin48–75
2 days since their last game.