UTSA Convocation Center · at UTSA
Closing line
UTSA -6.5✓ SIUE covered by 23.5
Closing total153.5Under by 16.5
| This season | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SIUE 70–81 UTSA · ✗ UTSA (84%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIUE | 34 | 43 | 77 |
| UTSA | 29 | 31 | 60 |
1st half: SIUE 34, UTSA 29 (SIUE by 5). The model had UTSA by 6.9 and a total of 70.5 (actual 63).
Team stats
| SIUE | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-58 48% | Field goals | 20-71 28% |
| 6-14 43% | 3-pointers | 7-29 24% |
| 15-26 58% | Free throws | 13-21 62% |
| 49 12 off | Rebounds | 41 17 off |
| 8 | Assists | 9 |
| 6 | Steals | 11 |
| 3 | Blocks | 4 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 17 | Fouls | 20 |
| 38 | Points in paint | 20 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 12 |
Players
| SIUE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myles Thompson F | 33 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 |
| Jordan Pickett G | 30 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-3 |
| Ring Malith G | 28 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 8-12 | 1-2 |
| Jack Campion G | 20 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Kyle Thomas F | 19 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jo Valrie F | 19 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Arnas Sakenis C | 15 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Darrion Baker F | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4-4 | 2-2 |
| CJ Hall G | 12 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| Darius Robinson Jr. G | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| Tyler King G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Iwo Baganc, Harrison Alexander, Corentin Efono, Dehrio McCaskill
| UTSA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamir Simpson G | 36 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 6-15 | 3-9 |
| Dorian Hayes G | 33 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3-9 | 3-8 |
| Kaidon Rayfield F | 24 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-3 |
| Matheo Coffi F | 22 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Austin Nunez G | 21 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2-16 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Baboucarr Njie F | 23 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 |
| Pierce Spencer G | 22 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-1 |
| Brent Moss G | 12 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Stanley Borden C | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Daniel Akitoby F | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Mo Njie C | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jackson Fazande, LJ Brown, Macaleab Rich, Vasean Allette
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUTSA -6.5
ModelUTSA -11.6
Model edgeUTSA +5.1
L SIUE covered
Total
Market153.5
Model150.5
Model edgeUnder 3.0
W Under
Projected score
SIUE 69.5 · UTSA 81.1
SIUE 77 · UTSA 60
Win probability
UTSA 84%
1st half
Spread
UTSA -6.9
SIUE -5.0
Total
70.5
63 points
Projected score
SIUE 31.8 · UTSA 38.7
SIUE 34 · UTSA 29
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTSA -8.5
2 → SIUE
CloseUTSA -6.5
2 pts toward SIUE
Total
Open154.5
▼ 1
Close153.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
SIUE +250 · UTSA -300
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTSA -8.5 · closed UTSA -6.5 · moved 2 toward SIUEmodel UTSA -11.5
model UTSA -11.5
Opened 154.5 · closed 153.5 · moved 1 downmodel 150.5
model 150.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SIUE
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 61-80 | +27.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 58-90 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 77-72 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 79-60 | +2.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 76-58 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 57-82 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 73-78 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 82-69 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 56-60 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 64-80 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 77-66 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 58-47 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 60-57 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 67-59 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 16 | @ | W 87-80 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 82-85 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 82-76 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 65-54 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 129.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 63-65 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 69-65 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 66-41 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 132.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 75-58 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 84-72 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 80-62 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 68-82 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 68-83 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 73-65 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 138 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 71-69 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 69-48 | +3.5 | W +24.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 40-78 | +28.5 | L −9.5 | 127.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
IU
L 61-80
+8.5
8
@
ILL
L 58-90
−5.5
12
@
INST
W 77-72
+11.5
15
@
WMU
W 79-60
+21.5
16
vs
CAN
W 76-58
+13.5
19
@
GB
L 57-82
−21.5
29
vs
UNF
L 73-78
−2.5
8
vs
BALL
W 82-69
+10.5
19
@
LR
L 56-60
−0.5
21
@
SEMO
L 64-80
−17.5
2
vs
WIU
W 77-66
+3.5
4
vs
LIN
W 58-47
+3.5
7
@
EIU
W 60-57
+1.5
11
vs
TNTC
W 67-59
+1.5
16
@
TNST
W 87-80
+5.5
18
@
UTM
L 82-85
−1.5
23
vs
USI
W 82-76
−0.5
25
vs
MORE
W 65-54
+8.5
30
@
LIN
L 63-65
−5.5
1
@
WIU
W 69-65
−0.5
4
vs
EIU
W 66-41
+18.5
6
@
TNTC
W 75-58
+18.5
13
vs
UTM
L 71-76
−10.5
15
vs
TNST
W 84-72
+7.5
20
@
MORE
W 80-62
+16.5
22
@
USI
L 68-82
−18.5
27
vs
SEMO
L 68-83
−18.5
1
vs
LR
W 73-65
+5.5
7
vs
TNST
W 71-69
−0.5
8
vs
SEMO
W 69-48
+24.5
20
vs
HOU
L 40-78
−9.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
IU
L 61-80
−9.5
8
@
ILL
L 58-90
−11.5
12
@
INST
W 77-72
−1.5
15
@
WMU
W 79-60
−3.5
16
vs
CAN
W 76-58
−8.5
19
@
GB
L 57-82
−10.5
29
vs
UNF
L 73-78
+1.5
8
vs
BALL
W 82-69
+13.5
19
@
LR
L 56-60
−21.5
21
@
SEMO
L 64-80
+3.5
2
vs
WIU
W 77-66
+8.5
4
vs
LIN
W 58-47
−32.5
7
@
EIU
W 60-57
−18.5
11
vs
TNTC
W 67-59
−11.5
16
@
TNST
W 87-80
+24.5
18
@
UTM
L 82-85
+29.5
23
vs
USI
W 82-76
+21.5
25
vs
MORE
W 65-54
−10.5
30
@
LIN
L 63-65
−9.5
1
@
WIU
W 69-65
+4.5
4
vs
EIU
W 66-41
−25.5
6
@
TNTC
W 75-58
−7.5
13
vs
UTM
L 71-76
+10.5
15
vs
TNST
W 84-72
+11.5
20
@
MORE
W 80-62
+9.5
22
@
USI
L 68-82
+9.5
27
vs
SEMO
L 68-83
+10.5
1
vs
LR
W 73-65
+1.5
7
vs
TNST
W 71-69
−1.5
8
vs
SEMO
W 69-48
−18.5
20
vs
HOU
L 40-78
−9.5
over 14under 17avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
UTSA
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12 | @ | L 72-85 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 64-81 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 72-86 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 76-74 | -0.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 78-71 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-82 | +22.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 60-75 | +19.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-76 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 95-85 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 75-78 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 63-92 | +5.5 | L −23.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 77-82 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 88-75 | +5.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 90-84 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 57-72 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 78-81 | +13.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 88-79 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 74-94 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 54-50 | +14.5 | W +18.5 | 134.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 60-61 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 79-80 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 64-69 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 76-80 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 73-78 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 89-96 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 84-56 | -1.5 | W +26.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 70-75 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 9 | @ | W 83-80 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 65-70 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
12
@
BRAD
L 72-85
−0.5
16
vs
LR
L 64-81
−25.5
25
@
TROY
L 72-86
−3.5
27
vs
MRMK
W 76-74
+1.5
30
vs
HCU
W 78-71
−5.5
3
@
SMC
L 74-82
+14.5
7
@
ARK
L 60-75
+4.5
13
vs
UND
W 80-76
−3.5
15
@
UND
W 95-85
+8.5
29
@
ARMY
L 75-78
−5.5
4
@
TULN
L 63-92
−23.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 77-82
−10.5
11
vs
WICH
W 88-75
+18.5
14
@
RICE
W 90-84
+10.5
18
vs
UNT
L 57-72
−6.5
21
@
UAB
L 78-81
+10.5
25
vs
TEM
W 88-79
+11.5
29
@
FAU
L 74-94
−11.5
1
@
UNT
W 54-50
+18.5
5
vs
TULN
L 60-61
+1.5
8
vs
ECU
L 79-80
+0.5
12
@
WICH
L 64-69
+0.5
15
@
TLSA
L 76-80
−2.5
19
vs
USF
L 73-78
−8.5
23
@
ECU
L 89-96
+1.5
2
vs
RICE
W 84-56
+26.5
4
vs
MEM
L 70-75
+3.5
9
@
CLT
W 83-80
+6.5
13
vs
ECU
L 65-70
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
12
@
BRAD
L 72-85
+1.5
16
vs
LR
L 64-81
−9.5
25
@
TROY
L 72-86
+6.5
27
vs
MRMK
W 76-74
+9.5
30
vs
HCU
W 78-71
+0.5
3
@
SMC
L 74-82
+14.5
7
@
ARK
L 60-75
−21.5
13
vs
UND
W 80-76
+1.5
15
@
UND
W 95-85
+25.5
29
@
ARMY
L 75-78
−3.5
4
@
TULN
L 63-92
+0.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 77-82
+3.5
11
vs
WICH
W 88-75
+2.5
14
@
RICE
W 90-84
+28.5
18
vs
UNT
L 57-72
−8.5
21
@
UAB
L 78-81
−2.5
25
vs
TEM
W 88-79
+10.5
29
@
FAU
L 74-94
+8.5
1
@
UNT
W 54-50
−30.5
5
vs
TULN
L 60-61
−25.5
8
vs
ECU
L 79-80
+14.5
12
@
WICH
L 64-69
−17.5
15
@
TLSA
L 76-80
+7.5
19
vs
USF
L 73-78
−3.5
23
@
ECU
L 89-96
+32.5
2
vs
RICE
W 84-56
−10.5
4
vs
MEM
L 70-75
−12.5
9
@
CLT
W 83-80
+15.5
13
vs
ECU
L 65-70
−12.5
over 17under 12avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SIUE
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
UTSA
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.