Mackey Arena · at Purdue
Closing line
PUR -33.5✓ EVAN covered by 2.5
Closing total150.5Under by 17.5
| This season | PUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: EVAN 55–94 PUR · ✓ PUR (100%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVAN | 22 | 29 | 51 |
| PUR | 41 | 41 | 82 |
1st half: EVAN 22, PUR 41 (PUR by 19). The model had PUR by 23.6 and a total of 69.9 (actual 63).
Team stats
| EVAN | PUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-70 30% | Field goals | 28-59 47% |
| 7-34 21% | 3-pointers | 13-29 45% |
| 2-4 50% | Free throws | 13-16 81% |
| 40 20 off | Rebounds | 40 12 off |
| 13 | Assists | 22 |
| 2 | Steals | 4 |
| 2 | Blocks | 4 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 15 | Fouls | 9 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 22 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 14 |
Players
| EVAN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leif Moeller G | 31 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-9 | 0-5 |
| Joshua Hughes F | 30 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 6-12 | 3-7 |
| AJ Casey F | 29 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 6-13 | 0-3 |
| Keishon Porter G | 29 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1-11 | 0-3 |
| Alex Hemenway G | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Bryce Quinet G | 29 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-4 |
| Trent Hundley F | 17 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 3-8 |
| James Dyson-Merwe F | 16 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Kaia Berridge G | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Leo Amari IV, Dakota Candler, Weston Aigner, Connor Turnbull, Marlon Barnes Jr., Aaron Gutman
| PUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith G | 30 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 3-9 | 0-2 |
| Fletcher Loyer G | 28 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 8-11 | 7-10 |
| Jack Benter G | 22 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-6 |
| C.J. Cox G | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Oscar Cluff C | 19 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Daniel Jacobsen C | 21 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 4-10 | 0-2 |
| Gicarri Harris G | 20 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-3 |
| Liam Murphy F | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Omer Mayer G | 18 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Jace Rayl G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Aaron Fine G | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Jack Lusk G | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Antione West Jr, Sam King, Raleigh Burgess, Trey Kaufman-Renn
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenPUR -29.5
4 → PUR
ClosePUR -33.5
4 pts toward PUR
Total
Open147.5
▲ 3
Close150.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
—
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened PUR -29.5 · closed PUR -33.5 · moved 4 toward PURmodel PUR -39
model PUR -39
Opened 147.5 · closed 150.5 · moved 3 upmodel 149.5
model 149.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | PUR -33.5 | PUR -39.1 | PUR +5.6 | L EVAN covered |
| Total | 150.5 | 149.3 | Under 1.2 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | EVAN 55.1 · PUR 94.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PUR -23.6 | PUR -19.0 |
| 1H total | 69.9 | 63 |
| 1H projected score | EVAN 23.1 · PUR 46.8 | EVAN 22 · PUR 41 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Evansville
31 games played
Straight up
10-21
32% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 63-80 | +13.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 63-80 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 81-92 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 30-80 | +24.5 | L −25.5 | 148.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 98-81 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 66-53 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 61-63 | +13.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 65-79 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 12 | vs | L 67-75 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 54-80 | +9.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 43-80 | +4.5 | L −32.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 57-40 | +4.5 | W +21.5 | 133.5 | U 97 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 68-53 | +7.5 | W +22.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 62-66 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 69-51 | +5.5 | W +23.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 40-63 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 120.5 | U 103 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 56-73 | +13.5 | L −3.5 | 132.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 82-85 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 67-78 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 25 | @ | W 78-68 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 78-74 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 80-75 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 59-68 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 74-80 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 54-71 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 79-69 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 79-74 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 77-82 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 61-65 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 125.5 | O 126 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 53-62 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 115 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 53-74 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
UNT
L 63-80
−3.5
13
@
MTSU
L 63-80
−6.5
16
vs
RAD
L 81-92
−14.5
19
@
OSU
L 30-80
−25.5
22
vs
GB
W 98-81
+18.5
24
vs
CAM
W 66-53
+9.5
3
@
MUR
L 61-63
+11.5
7
vs
WKU
L 65-79
−7.5
12
vs
UTC
L 67-75
−6.5
18
@
UTA
L 54-80
−16.5
21
@
BALL
L 43-80
−32.5
29
vs
MOST
W 57-40
+21.5
1
@
SIU
W 68-53
+22.5
4
vs
INST
L 62-66
−0.5
8
vs
ILST
W 69-51
+23.5
11
@
DRKE
L 40-63
−7.5
14
@
UNI
L 56-73
−3.5
18
vs
BEL
L 82-85
+2.5
22
vs
UIC
L 67-78
−5.5
25
@
VAL
W 78-68
+17.5
29
vs
MUR
W 78-74
+9.5
2
@
BEL
W 80-75
+15.5
5
vs
SIU
L 59-68
−10.5
8
vs
BRAD
L 74-80
−0.5
12
@
MOST
L 54-71
−13.5
16
vs
VAL
W 79-69
+11.5
19
@
INST
W 79-74
+12.5
22
@
UIC
L 77-82
+2.5
26
vs
DRKE
L 61-65
+4.5
2
@
ILST
L 53-62
+2.5
6
vs
MUR
L 53-74
−15.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
UNT
L 63-80
+9.5
13
@
MTSU
L 63-80
−1.5
16
vs
RAD
L 81-92
+29.5
19
@
OSU
L 30-80
−38.5
22
vs
GB
W 98-81
+27.5
24
vs
CAM
W 66-53
−25.5
3
@
MUR
L 61-63
−21.5
7
vs
WKU
L 65-79
−8.5
12
vs
UTC
L 67-75
−6.5
18
@
UTA
L 54-80
−17.5
21
@
BALL
L 43-80
−16.5
29
vs
MOST
W 57-40
−36.5
1
@
SIU
W 68-53
−17.5
4
vs
INST
L 62-66
−22.5
8
vs
ILST
W 69-51
−11.5
11
@
DRKE
L 40-63
−17.5
14
@
UNI
L 56-73
−3.5
18
vs
BEL
L 82-85
+19.5
22
vs
UIC
L 67-78
+2.5
25
@
VAL
W 78-68
+4.5
29
vs
MUR
W 78-74
+17.5
2
@
BEL
W 80-75
+2.5
5
vs
SIU
L 59-68
−14.5
8
vs
BRAD
L 74-80
+15.5
12
@
MOST
L 54-71
−7.5
16
vs
VAL
W 79-69
+5.5
19
@
INST
W 79-74
+3.5
22
@
UIC
L 77-82
+13.5
26
vs
DRKE
L 61-65
+0.5
2
@
ILST
L 53-62
−26.5
6
vs
MUR
L 53-74
−2.5
over 13under 18avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Purdue
36 games played
Straight up
24-12
67% wins
Against the spread
20-16
56% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-17
53% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 90-73 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 72-50 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 92-84 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-78 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 58-76 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 80-45 | -20.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 71-61 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-78 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 70-81 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 66-70 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 83-64 | -21.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 81-61 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 79-61 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 68-50 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 104-68 | -8.5 | W +27.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 69-58 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 65-58 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 70-73 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-64 | -4.5 | W +22.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-76 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 90-81 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 90-72 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 73-75 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 84-94 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 66-75 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 58-73 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-66 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 100-71 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 80-88 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 76-71 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 68-86 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 75-63 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 76-62 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 28 | vs | L 60-62 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
AMCC
W 90-73
−8.5
8
vs
NKU
W 72-50
+1.5
11
vs
YALE
W 92-84
−6.5
15
vs
ALA
W 87-78
+13.5
19
@
MARQ
L 58-76
−12.5
23
vs
MRSH
W 80-45
+14.5
28
vs
NCSU
W 71-61
+4.5
29
vs
MISS
W 80-78
−1.5
5
@
PSU
L 70-81
−8.5
8
vs
MD
W 83-78
+0.5
14
vs
TA&M
L 66-70
−5.5
21
vs
AUB
L 69-87
−7.5
29
vs
TOL
W 83-64
−2.5
2
@
MINN
W 81-61
+14.5
5
vs
NU
W 79-61
+11.5
9
@
RUTG
W 68-50
+15.5
12
vs
NEB
W 104-68
+27.5
15
@
WASH
W 69-58
+3.5
18
@
ORE
W 65-58
+9.5
21
vs
OSU
L 70-73
−12.5
24
vs
MICH
W 91-64
+22.5
31
vs
IU
W 81-76
−7.5
4
@
IOWA
W 90-81
+2.5
7
vs
USC
W 90-72
+4.5
11
@
MICH
L 73-75
+0.5
15
vs
WIS
L 84-94
−16.5
18
@
MSU
L 66-75
−5.5
23
@
IU
L 58-73
−18.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 76-66
+4.5
4
vs
RUTG
W 100-71
+17.5
7
@
ILL
L 80-88
−3.5
13
vs
USC
W 76-71
−5.5
14
vs
MICH
L 68-86
−20.5
20
vs
HPU
W 75-63
+4.5
22
vs
MCN
W 76-62
+7.5
28
vs
HOU
L 60-62
+6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 16avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
AMCC
W 90-73
+16.5
8
vs
NKU
W 72-50
−25.5
11
vs
YALE
W 92-84
+31.5
15
vs
ALA
W 87-78
−0.5
19
@
MARQ
L 58-76
−18.5
23
vs
MRSH
W 80-45
−24.5
28
vs
NCSU
W 71-61
−15.5
29
vs
MISS
W 80-78
+13.5
5
@
PSU
L 70-81
+1.5
8
vs
MD
W 83-78
+18.5
14
vs
TA&M
L 66-70
−6.5
21
vs
AUB
L 69-87
+7.5
29
vs
TOL
W 83-64
−8.5
2
@
MINN
W 81-61
+7.5
5
vs
NU
W 79-61
+1.5
9
@
RUTG
W 68-50
−30.5
12
vs
NEB
W 104-68
+31.5
15
@
WASH
W 69-58
−16.5
18
@
ORE
W 65-58
−24.5
21
vs
OSU
L 70-73
+2.5
24
vs
MICH
W 91-64
+4.5
31
vs
IU
W 81-76
+11.5
4
@
IOWA
W 90-81
+15.5
7
vs
USC
W 90-72
+16.5
11
@
MICH
L 73-75
−5.5
15
vs
WIS
L 84-94
+26.5
18
@
MSU
L 66-75
−7.5
23
@
IU
L 58-73
−17.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 76-66
+4.5
4
vs
RUTG
W 100-71
+20.5
7
@
ILL
L 80-88
+9.5
13
vs
USC
W 76-71
−3.5
14
vs
MICH
L 68-86
+3.5
20
vs
HPU
W 75-63
−15.5
22
vs
MCN
W 76-62
−3.5
28
vs
HOU
L 60-62
−12.5
over 19under 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Evansville
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Purdue
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.