United Supermarkets Arena · at Texas Tech
Closing line
TTU -31.5✓ SHSU covered by 10.5
Closing total156.5Over by 18.5
| This season | TTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 1-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 1-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 1-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SHSU 62–93 TTU · ✓ TTU (100%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHSU | 37 | 40 | 77 |
| TTU | 47 | 51 | 98 |
1st half: SHSU 37, TTU 47 (TTU by 10). The model had TTU by 18.4 and a total of 72.3 (actual 84).
Team stats
| SHSU | TTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-65 43% | Field goals | 29-58 50% |
| 7-20 35% | 3-pointers | 12-28 43% |
| 14-20 70% | Free throws | 28-43 65% |
| 37 18 off | Rebounds | 41 19 off |
| 11 | Assists | 16 |
| 5 | Steals | 9 |
| 3 | Blocks | 2 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 30 | Fouls | 19 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 14 |
Players
| SHSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Begg G | 28 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 6-15 | 3-8 |
| Po'Boigh King G | 28 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-2 |
| Veljko Ilic F | 24 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 6-8 | 0-0 |
| Kashie Natt G | 23 | 16 | 11 | 2 | 6-10 | 2-2 |
| Damon Nicholas Jr. G | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jacob Walker G | 21 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-2 |
| Isaiah Manning G | 21 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1-8 | 0-5 |
| Jacobe Coleman G | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| CJ Beaumont G | 13 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Matt Dann F | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Jaxson Ford F | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jackson Rogers, Cheikh Sadibou Ndiaye, Noah Benny, Nathan Nguyen
| TTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Anderson G | 35 | 18 | 2 | 7 | 4-8 | 3-4 |
| Donovan Atwell G | 35 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 6-11 | 6-11 |
| JT Toppin F | 32 | 31 | 14 | 4 | 10-19 | 0-3 |
| Tyeree Bryan G | 28 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-2 |
| Nolan Groves G | 16 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| LeJuan Watts G | 25 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 |
| Jaylen Petty G | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-6 | 0-5 |
| Marial Akuentok F | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Jazz Henderson Jr. G | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jack Francis G | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Leon Horner, Luke Bamgboye, LaTrell Hoover, Josiah Moseley
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketTTU -31.5
ModelTTU -30.5
Model edgeSHSU +1.0
W SHSU covered
Total
Market156.5
Model154.5
Model edgeUnder 2.0
L Over
Projected score
SHSU 62 · TTU 92.5
SHSU 77 · TTU 98
Win probability
TTU 100%
1st half
Spread
TTU -18.4
TTU -10.0
Total
72.3
84 points
Projected score
SHSU 27 · TTU 45.4
SHSU 37 · TTU 47
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenTTU -27.5
4 → TTU
CloseTTU -31.5
4 pts toward TTU
Total
Open150.5
▲ 6
Close156.5
Up 6 since the open
Moneyline
—
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened TTU -27.5 · closed TTU -31.5 · moved 4 toward TTUmodel TTU -30.5
model TTU -30.5
Opened 150.5 · closed 156.5 · moved 6 upmodel 154.5
model 154.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SHSU 0–1 TTUTTU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SHSU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2023-24 | SHSU 60 @ TTU 96 | TTU -16.5 | TTU W |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Sam Houston
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
9-20
31% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 75-91 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 91-62 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-104 | +16.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 85-72 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 63-66 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 60-69 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 82-78 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 71-97 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 87-71 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 78-110 | +15.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 71-75 | +0.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 72-81 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 68-76 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 81-74 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 69-75 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 62-70 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 75-77 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 25 | vs | L 66-75 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 61-66 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 82-85 | -0.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 61-64 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 66-61 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 78-76 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 78-62 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 70-74 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 66-90 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 89-87 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-69 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 65-79 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 75-91
−5.5
9
@
TAR
W 91-62
+23.5
12
@
BAY
L 67-104
−20.5
17
@
LAM
W 85-72
+6.5
27
vs
APP
L 63-66
−9.5
29
@
UNCW
L 60-69
−10.5
30
vs
COLG
W 82-78
−2.5
3
@
IU
L 71-97
−12.5
7
vs
TXSO
W 87-71
+4.5
21
@
PITT
L 78-110
−16.5
2
@
NMSU
L 71-75
−3.5
4
@
UTEP
L 72-81
−3.5
9
vs
LIB
L 68-76
−4.5
11
vs
FIU
W 81-74
−1.5
16
@
KENN
L 69-75
−4.5
18
@
JXST
L 62-70
−6.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 75-77
−0.5
25
vs
WKU
L 66-75
−12.5
1
@
LT
L 61-66
+1.5
6
@
FIU
L 82-85
−3.5
8
@
LIB
L 61-64
+7.5
13
vs
JXST
W 66-61
+2.5
15
vs
KENN
W 78-76
−0.5
20
@
WKU
W 78-62
+20.5
22
@
MTSU
L 70-74
+0.5
1
vs
LT
L 66-90
−26.5
6
vs
UTEP
W 89-87
−0.5
8
vs
NMSU
W 76-69
+5.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 65-79
−11.5
covered 9didn’t cover 20avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 75-91
+22.5
9
@
TAR
W 91-62
+8.5
12
@
BAY
L 67-104
+20.5
17
@
LAM
W 85-72
+8.5
27
vs
APP
L 63-66
−13.5
29
@
UNCW
L 60-69
−21.5
30
vs
COLG
W 82-78
+22.5
3
@
IU
L 71-97
+13.5
7
vs
TXSO
W 87-71
+11.5
21
@
PITT
L 78-110
+34.5
2
@
NMSU
L 71-75
−3.5
4
@
UTEP
L 72-81
+6.5
9
vs
LIB
L 68-76
+1.5
11
vs
FIU
W 81-74
+2.5
16
@
KENN
L 69-75
−17.5
18
@
JXST
L 62-70
−14.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 75-77
+2.5
25
vs
WKU
L 66-75
−13.5
1
@
LT
L 61-66
−15.5
6
@
FIU
L 82-85
+22.5
8
@
LIB
L 61-64
−17.5
13
vs
JXST
W 66-61
−15.5
15
vs
KENN
W 78-76
+3.5
20
@
WKU
W 78-62
−14.5
22
@
MTSU
L 70-74
−5.5
1
vs
LT
L 66-90
+15.5
6
vs
UTEP
W 89-87
+30.5
8
vs
NMSU
W 76-69
+8.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 65-79
−4.5
over 17under 12avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas Tech
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
19-18
51% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
23-14
62% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 94-61 | -32.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 86-65 | -34.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 96-49 | -18.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 98-64 | -40.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 77-78 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 79-74 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 89-64 | -22.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 76-62 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 8 | vs | L 67-72 | -0.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 86-50 | -26.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 101-57 | -24.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 83-87 | -13.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 93-65 | -2.5 | W +25.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 72-67 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 84-85 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 61-57 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 70-54 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 81-71 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 64-54 | -18.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 71-57 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 82-81 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 73-59 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 73-82 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 111-106 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 217 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 93-55 | -9.5 | W +28.5 | 147.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 66-69 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 73-51 | -9.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 61-69 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 78-73 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 91-75 | -19.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 85-57 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 76-74 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 80-86 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 82-72 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 77-64 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 125.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 85-83 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 29 | vs | L 79-84 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
BCU
W 94-61
+0.5
8
vs
NWST
W 86-65
−13.5
13
vs
WYO
W 96-49
+28.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 98-64
−6.5
21
vs
JOES
L 77-78
−11.5
22
vs
SYR
W 79-74
−6.5
29
vs
UNCO
W 89-64
+2.5
4
vs
DEP
W 76-62
+0.5
8
vs
TA&M
L 67-72
−5.5
16
vs
ORU
W 86-50
+9.5
21
vs
LAM
W 101-57
+19.5
31
vs
UCF
L 83-87
−17.5
4
@
UTAH
W 93-65
+25.5
7
@
BYU
W 72-67
+6.5
11
vs
ISU
L 84-85
−3.5
14
@
KSU
W 61-57
−2.5
18
vs
ARIZ
W 70-54
+11.5
21
@
CIN
W 81-71
+8.5
26
vs
OKST
W 64-54
−8.5
29
vs
TCU
W 71-57
+2.5
1
@
HOU
W 82-81
+10.5
4
vs
BAY
W 73-59
+6.5
8
@
ARIZ
L 73-82
−5.5
12
vs
ASU
W 111-106
−11.5
15
@
OKST
W 93-55
+28.5
18
@
TCU
L 66-69
−10.5
22
vs
WVU
W 73-51
+12.5
24
vs
HOU
L 61-69
−3.5
1
@
KU
W 78-73
+8.5
5
vs
COLO
W 91-75
−3.5
8
@
ASU
W 85-57
+14.5
13
vs
BAY
W 76-74
−4.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 80-86
−7.5
20
vs
UNCW
W 82-72
−5.5
22
vs
DRKE
W 77-64
+5.5
27
vs
ARK
W 85-83
−3.5
29
vs
FLA
L 79-84
+1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 18avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
BCU
W 94-61
+7.5
8
vs
NWST
W 86-65
+2.5
13
vs
WYO
W 96-49
−0.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 98-64
+5.5
21
vs
JOES
L 77-78
+5.5
22
vs
SYR
W 79-74
+1.5
29
vs
UNCO
W 89-64
+1.5
4
vs
DEP
W 76-62
−9.5
8
vs
TA&M
L 67-72
−4.5
16
vs
ORU
W 86-50
−12.5
21
vs
LAM
W 101-57
+17.5
31
vs
UCF
L 83-87
+22.5
4
@
UTAH
W 93-65
+5.5
7
@
BYU
W 72-67
−8.5
11
vs
ISU
L 84-85
+21.5
14
@
KSU
W 61-57
−26.5
18
vs
ARIZ
W 70-54
−25.5
21
@
CIN
W 81-71
+18.5
26
vs
OKST
W 64-54
−28.5
29
vs
TCU
W 71-57
−8.5
1
@
HOU
W 82-81
+35.5
4
vs
BAY
W 73-59
−10.5
8
@
ARIZ
L 73-82
+4.5
12
vs
ASU
W 111-106
+71.5
15
@
OKST
W 93-55
+0.5
18
@
TCU
L 66-69
−6.5
22
vs
WVU
W 73-51
−10.5
24
vs
HOU
L 61-69
−0.5
1
@
KU
W 78-73
+6.5
5
vs
COLO
W 91-75
+23.5
8
@
ASU
W 85-57
−11.5
13
vs
BAY
W 76-74
+7.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 80-86
+12.5
20
vs
UNCW
W 82-72
+10.5
22
vs
DRKE
W 77-64
+15.5
27
vs
ARK
W 85-83
+18.5
29
vs
FLA
L 79-84
+4.5
over 23under 14avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Sam Houston
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Texas Tech
1-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Lindenwood Lions98–60
3 days since their last game.